so a common claim I see made is that arch is up to date than Debian but harder to maintain and easier to break. Is there a good sort of middle ground distro between the reliability of Debian and the up-to-date packages of arch?
so a common claim I see made is that arch is up to date than Debian but harder to maintain and easier to break. Is there a good sort of middle ground distro between the reliability of Debian and the up-to-date packages of arch?
You are the meme
They were not asking about immutable Linux…
Atomic distros are still distros, op never excluded that particular kind
True but you could of just said something Fedora based
I’m not comfortable that Fedora and derivatives give the same stability opportunity as Atomic distros
No they probably wanted to hear how great some random Arch derivatives that does that thing 3 people are talking about