@sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf to Firefox@lemmy.mlEnglish • 1 year agoMozilla officially opposes Web Enviroment Integrity API (DRM for web pages proposal from Google)github.comexternal-linkmessage-square129fedilinkarrow-up11.41Karrow-down115cross-posted to: firefox@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11.4Karrow-down1external-linkMozilla officially opposes Web Enviroment Integrity API (DRM for web pages proposal from Google)github.com@sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf to Firefox@lemmy.mlEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square129fedilinkcross-posted to: firefox@lemmy.ml
minus-square@jumperalex@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year agowhy did you waste your time asking that question when you already knew the answer? It’s always the profits!!!
minus-square@Brahm1nmam@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-21 year agoI get it costs money to develop accessibility, but you can’t rip off a blind man if he can’t navigate your sight. I truly don’t get it. Edit: site, not sight
minus-square@jumperalex@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoI want to laugh but … well … I’m not crying YOU’RE CRYING
minus-square@Eranziel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoThey’ve simply run the numbers and decided it would cost more to support the blind man’s access than they could get from plundering the blind man.
why did you waste your time asking that question when you already knew the answer?
It’s always the profits!!!
I get it costs money to develop accessibility, but you can’t rip off a blind man if he can’t navigate your sight. I truly don’t get it.
Edit: site, not sight
I want to laugh but … well … I’m not crying YOU’RE CRYING
They’ve simply run the numbers and decided it would cost more to support the blind man’s access than they could get from plundering the blind man.