(Also extends to people who refuse to use Linux too!)

Every unique Linux Desktop setup tells a story, about the user’s journey and their trials. I feel like every decision, ranging from theming to functional choices, is a direct reflection of who we are on the inside.

An open-ended question for the Linux users here: Why do you use what you do? What are the choices you’ve had to make when planning it out?

I’ll go first: I use OpenSUSE Tumbleweed with the Niri Scrolling Compositor(Rofi, Alacritty and Waybar), recently switched from CosmicDE

I run this setup because I keep coming back to use shiny new-ish software on a daily basis.

I prefer this over arch(which I used for 2 years in the covid arc), because it’s quite a bit more stable despite being a rolling release distro.

I chose niri because I miss having a dual monitor on the go, and tiling windows isn’t good enough for me. Scrolling feels smooth, fancy and just right. The overview menu is very addicting, and I may not be able to go back to Windows after this!

This was my first standalone WM/Compositor setup, so there were many little pains, but no regrets.

Would love to hear more thoughts, perspectives and experiences!

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    You’re being very melodramatic about the whole thing…

    It’s a computer. We want to use it under our terms. End of story.

    • stellargmite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Wheres the melodrama in this post ? I’m detecting enthusiasm maybe, but not melodrama. They’re looking for peoples thoughts and experience, i.e what your own terms are for making these choices. Seems reasonable. Sharing that is optional of course and I also choose not to, end of story.

      • hellmo_luciferrari@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I would agree with this. I don’t see it as melodramatic.

        Enthusiastic, yeah. And nothing wrong with someone interested in tech to also take the more poetic route of expression.

        Many of the tech enthusiast types are more akin to mindless 1s and 0s. And not everyone is.

        So like you did, rather lack thereof, the response of your own story is optional. I chose to share, because it’s fun to discuss. This isn’t a changelog, or patch notes. This is part or being human and sharing something other than binary data.

    • DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s what I thought. OP made it poetic. I just want to use my PC without distractions and being watched all the time, that’s all.

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    I use arch with kde with very little modification apart from changing wallpapers and taskbar stuff to make it more windows like. I’m a boring guy who still can’t get away from the Windows feel

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Astrology, but penguin themed.

    You are such a Debian.

    Arch and Gentoos never got along.

    If you are a Nix do not install KDE on the first monday of the month, it’s bad luck.

  • Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m old and not keen on tinkering around anymore, that’s why I use Linux Mint Cinnamon. It just works and doesn’t take much time to maintain.

    • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Same. I have installed so many systems that I just want the defaults to be what I’m used to. The OS itself is just a tool to let me work on the things I actually find interesting.

  • Maragato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    I also use openSUSE Tumbleweed for the same reasons as you. In my case I also like the security configuration that openSUSE has (SELinux+Firewalld) and its snapshot restore tool in case of failure (snapper). I think openSUSE is one of the distributions that enforces security the most as soon as you install the system and to maintain that security I try to install only the software I need and I try not to add external repositories. I would like to try Aeon because I think it is a more security-focused distro but I still need to dual-boot with Windows to connect to my work and Aeon doesn’t allow this. In short, I use Tumbleweed as it comes out of the box and just add the packman repository. Many people think that Linux is free of malware and viruses and install many programs from aur, obs, external repositories,… without thinking that they are giving root access to code of dubious origin.

  • Die Martin Die@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I started with Puppy Linux because I wanted to try Linux, and my 350MHz Celeron with 160MB of RAM and 4GB of disk space (of which I had around 1GB free) wasn’t enough to run neither any flavor of the major distros, nor any remotely recent version of Windows that wasn’t XP stripped down to the bare minimum, and even that ran like shit. This was around 2008.

    After being able to afford a more recent machine (3GHz Intel something Dual Core, with 4GB of RAM and 500GB HDD), I switched to vanilla Ubuntu, with its Unity DE, then Xfce4.

    I’ve been using the LUbuntu flavor (LXDE) since it is more lightweight than the alternatives. Don’t really care about bells and whistles now, just a functional and fast desktop.

    My most recent laptop is dead now, tho, and I don’t see myself getting anything soon :(

  • Sarothazrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Mint Cinnamon. I’m very new to Linux, only switched about a month ago after using Windows for almost 35 years (my first computer was a windows 95).

    Really enjoying it so far, and it’s actually a fun learning experience.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I use Fedora because I barely have to do any customization to get it how I like. An almost vanilla version of Gnome? Check. Flatpak? Check. Nothing to uninstall (I’m looking at you, snapd)? Check. Steam with just a few clicks? Check.

    It’s almost perfect, and making it perfect is trivial. That used to be what I said about Ubuntu.

    I haven’t used Windows much since Windows Vista, so I don’t really have any way to compare with Win10/Win11.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I use whatever the latest Ubuntu LTS is on my desktops and usually laptops (besides my Macbook) at the time, and whatever the latest stable Debian release is at the time on my home lab servers.

    I am very much a utilitarian and function over form kind of person so I choose what I do because it is the best fit for the problem I was trying to solve, usually with little thought to looks or UI design. I find I don’t really care so much how something is done on a given platform, just that there is a way. As a result stuff like theme options, dynamic wallpapers, etc are not something I really care about. I have been using the same black image as my wallpaper on every computer I have used for at least a decade now for example. I arrange the UI in whatever way I feel is the most functional for me within the constraints of what the platform supports out of the box. Meaning I couldn’t care less for stuff like the old school Window blinds program and what not.

    Ubuntu over Windows because I wanted to get away from the ever increasing ads and general slop that Microsoft was putting into Windows while still retaining some support for gaming(thanks to Valve and Proton) and building my own systems.

    Debian on servers over Ubuntu or something RPM based because Debian stable is rock solid and will run whatever you put on it without issue in my experience.

  • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Honestly, I haven messed with any of this. I just installed Mint, made sure everything works and haven’t messed with it since. It’s a tool and nothing more. It is also the reason why I left Windows. They were trying to force too many features and ads on something that I didn’t want to be more than an operating system

    The main customization has been that i added app snap store for the software that I couldn’t find in the default software store

  • oo1@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I use Linux because it is free and good enough to do most stuff I want to do on a computer.

    I use windows at work because I get paid - so from my perspective it is cheaper than free. It makes it frustrating to do the stuff I’m supposed to do but my employers are fucking idiots so it doesn’t really matter.

  • skyIine@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I had configured a windows/linux mint dual boot a few years ago because I thought it would be a cool and fun thing to do. Flash forward to now, and I’m using the mint OS 99% of the time.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    The only bad OS is one that won’t do what you want when you want to do it.

    I run a mixed environment at home, Windows machine for work, personal Windows machine for interoperability, Linux on the Steam Deck since that what it comes with, external Windows SSD for the Steam Deck since some games absolutely require Windows, Linux NAS for media, Linux Raspberry Pis for some fun side projects, my wife runs MacOS because she’s an Apple Fangirl, Android phone and tablet, iOS work phone for testing. Xbox, Playstation, Switch consoles for gaming.

  • pyssla@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I use secureblue, because it offers the (AFAIK unique) intersection between:

    • a security-first[1] approach while being fit for general computing
    • a first-class citizen of the ‘immutable’ reprovisionable, anti-hysteresis paradigm
    • a well-maintained project with many active contributors that exhibit a proactive stance when it comes to implementing (security) improvements

    1. To be precise, it’s actually Linux-first and security-second. For an actual security-first approach, consider taking a look at Sculpt OS employed with the seL4 kernel run on ARM or 64-bit RISC-V. ↩︎