Yeah, it’s dangerous for a community to tolerate and adopt closed-source software. We should have done a better job pressuring them to license it openly.

The OSM wiki pointed me to Maperitive first, but I wish it pointed me to qgis first. We should probably edit the wiki with a huge warning banner that the code is closed, the app is full of bugs, and that it is not (and can not be) updated.

Edit: I took my own advice and added a big red box to the top of the article warning the user and pointing them to QGIS instead.

Edit 2: Do we have any way to know when the latest version of Maperitive (v2.4.3) was released? Usually I’d check the git repo, but…

Edit 3: stat on the Maperitive-latest.zip file says that it’s last modified 2018-02-27 17:25:07, so it’s at least 6 years old.

Thank you for your input, but I think it’s worth mentioning that that’s absolutely not true.

To be clear: I’m not asking for a no-KYC solution. I’m happy to auth with my company’s official government-issued registration records, with my personal government-issued ID, etc.

I’m not aware of any regulations that require a phone number. There are regulations (eg UK’s PSD2) that effectively require 2FA – and many banks chose to implement this requirement via phone numbers.

Hopefully one day the regulations will explicitly prohibit 2FA OTPs from being transmitted at all (ie so banks are forced to use secure 2FA methods like TOTP or U2F instead of insecure methods like SMS, email, etc). But currently I’m not aware of any KYC regulations that require a phone number from the customer.

Good bot